Yesterday the $3100 fundraising campaign announced six months ago concluded successfully! Thanks to the generosity of ten different donors, we were able to meet the goal in the nick of time yesterday. Because of you, my monograph (As the Bandit Will I Confess You) will be transformed into an Open Access digital book by the publisher (University of Strasbourg) and distributor (Brepols). Thank you to Eric Hellman for creating the Unglue.it project and site, as well as your donation. Thank you also to Alexander Sterkens at Brepols and Prof. Rémi Gounelle at Strasbourg for putting together the terms of the agreement to flip/unglue/unlatch this book to Open Access. It’s exciting to think about this print book getting a new, digital life as an Open Access resource!
Library Futures, in concert with the Georgetown Intellectual Property and Information Policy (iPIP) Clinic, has recently released an excellent, succinct summary of the ethical reasons for public policy-makers to craft legislation that protects the ability of libraries to continue practicing Controlled Digital Lending:
- CDL Maximizes ECONOMIC Efficiency and Opportunity for Communities
- CDL Promotes Equitable and Dependable EDUCATION
- CDL Improves the CIVIL RIGHTS Function of Libraries
- CDL Democratizes Knowledge by Expanding ACCESS
Libraries have traditionally been not merely purchasers but more importantly stewards of content, content that they own and which they distribute on their own terms in accordance with Fair Use and First Sale law. More and more these days, Libraries are becoming mere consumers, mediators for digital content vendors to extract as much money and data as they can from their patrons. CDL preserves the traditional role of Libraries while allowing us to have alternatives to accepting restrictive, expensive, and exploitative vendor terms and licenses.
Kudos to the Library Futures team for elaborating these moral imperatives as excellent and thoughtful supplements to the legal reasoning in the CDL White Paper.
Libraries have an important role in legislative activism for the sake of the public good. Let’s get to it!
As a Democratic voter and donor, a lifelong educator, a tenure-track faculty member at a public university, and someone who has been crushed for decades by student loan debt and repeatedly failed by the administrative incompetence and backlog of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, I am deeply concerned about your factually inaccurate statement on July 28, 2021 about the Executive branch not being able to forgive student loans. The US Education code specifically provides for the Secretary of Education to do this. Forgiveness of interest—which has now been done across multiple administrations—is itself an exercise of this authority. While legislative solutions to the student debt crisis are commendable, all solutions—both Executive and Legislative—should be furthered.
The other part of your statement that was deeply disturbing was about how forgiving student loans using other people’s taxes would not be perceived as fair. That comment was both out of touch and prejudicial in the extreme.Read More »
One of the best parts about my job as a ScholComm Librarian is working with amazing students on meaningful publishing projects. As part of a team working on a Dept of Ed funded grant with our National Resource Center for Asian Languages, I had the wonderful privilege of collaborating with a team of BFA and MFA illustrators to make Vietnamese language books in support of bilingual K-12 education in Orange County. One of our illustrators, a young, gifted and Black artist by the name of Leah Simone Metters, brought tremendous energy, creativity and leadership to the project.
Now that my Open Science book experiment on the First Gospel (Qn) is almost a year old, over 1000 pages, more than 325,000 words, has over 2500 unique downloads, and is the basis for an upcoming peer-reviewed presentation in the Digital Humanities section of the Society of Biblical Literature this November, it felt like the right time to take the book to the next level of professional publishing. So I decided to commission book cover art, and I could think of no artist better suited to realize my vision for the book than Leah.Read More »
Heard today from my ScholComm colleague Lana Wood that the President at CSU East Bay today signed the Green Open Access Policy passed for the second year in a row by their Academic Senate. Congrats to Lana, her policy co-champion (Vanessa Yingling from Kinesiology), the CSUEB Committee on Research, the CSUEB Academic Senate, and the CSUEB President on being on the first CSU to achieve this honor. CSUEB joins the hallowed ranks of the UCs, Harvard, MIT, Caltech, Stanford, and lots of R1, R2, M1, M2, and Liberal Arts institutions that have passed such policies!
This is not only a tremendous honor for Lana and CSUEB, but also a significant milestone in the Open Access movement and achievement in the scientific community and for the public good. Like comparable Green OA opt-out policies at other universities, this one retains faculty copyright over articles and secures default open access licenses that benefit students, the general public, and institutional web/repository usage. It’s a win-win-win for everyone except publisher monopolies. And it finally got done at the nation’s largest public university system!Read More »
Lifting up this excellent article in the Daily Beast by Jennie Rose Halperin, the Executive Director of Library Futures. It highlights the recent forum at Georgetown Law with Senator Ron Wyden and provides a quick litany of the negative impacts of ebook licensing on public education. To quote just one example:
The draconian terms mean, for example, that a single e-copy of The Diary of Anne Frank can cost a school district as much as $27 per student per year—with the lion’s share of the money going to billion-dollar publishing companies.
Library Futures is welcoming consortial and university partners to join in activism around technological and educational initiatives to preserve Library rights. Johns Hopkins has recently joined as a partner. Here’s hoping the Cal State Libraries will consider joining as well!
Copying the letter I sent today to Cambridge University Press both as a ScholComm diary entry and as an example to authors as to how you can self-advocate for OA fee waivers. Squeaky wheels and such…
Read More »
April 17, 2021
Dear Cambridge University Press Representative,
Thank you for your excellent work supporting high-quality, peer-reviewed academic publishing. I am writing as the corresponding author of an article recently accepted for your journal, Harvard Theological Review, to ask for a waiver of the Gold Open Access APC of $3200.
I’m copying and pasting part of the email I just sent to our CFA Bargaining Team to consider in their negotiations with the CSUCO.
Read More »
… ask for strong financial support for Transformative Agreements and for the Article Processing Charges and Book Processing Charges that faculty, administrators, and students incur in their academic publishing.
[Cross-posted from Vocesanticae.com]
Got confirmation of acceptance of a second paper this morning. Thank you to the session chairs (Garrick Allen and Paul Dilley) and the review committee for the opportunity to present this research.
Title: Introducing Linked Open Data Living Informational Books
Abstract: In a recent article, Claire Clivaz surveys the rise of VREs (Virtual Research Environments) that allow for scientific hypothesis-driven, iterative, and collaborative research in the Humanities. In this presentation, we propose a new kind of VRE, the Linked Open Data Living Informational Book or LODLIB, essentially a scientific hypothesis-driven iterative digital codex. LODLIBs follow the structure of scientific articles (introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion), leverage international Linked Open Data standards (unique and interconnected DOIs), rely on non-commercial Open Science repositories, include internal data dictionaries and lexicographical resources, embed datasets and code within the digital book, invite global open peer-review and collaboration, and allow for cycles of continuous improvement characteristic of agile software and systems development. Essentially, the LODLIB reimagines the codex as human- and machine-readable software, bringing together research and publishing, the Sciences and the Humanities. The LODLIB format inverts the power- and economic relationships between academic authors and publishers, opens academic discourse to the global public, allows for rich analytics about readership and citations, and has the potential to make monographs and compilations go viral in online environments. The conclusion will relate the story of the presenter’s prototyping of the LODLIB format to propose and realize a new, scientific solution to Q and the Synoptic Problem.
Subjects: Computer-Assisted Research | Historical Criticism | Lexicography
On March 23, the Google Scholar team announced on their blog a new contribution to the OA self-archiving scholarly ecosystem. Google has released new functionality to help authors identify which articles are deposited OA in compliance with funder (whether gov or NGO) OA mandates all the while leveraging Google Drive–connected to a Google Scholar author’s profile–into an article self-archiving solution.
A SWOT-styled analysis follows under the fold:Read More »